Getting to know a point of view
"philosophy of egoism"
Our main problem with absolute and pure reality is that we do not have equal perception limits of the nature of things
In fact, the level of our understanding of anything is effective in the final perception of the nature of that thing, and this means that the world we understand may not be what it really is.
Since there is always relativity in our understanding of the nature of things, we can only learn from each of our choices what our senses selectively choose and what our mind creates from it in the bigger picture.
Kant discussed the reasonableness of our relationship between the entity (subject) and the intention (object) and said that everything that exists is an expression of the entity's understanding of it:
"Whatever we see are not what we see. Certainly, what the object is and can be will remain unknown to us and still separate from the extent of our senses.
We know nothing except the method by which we perceive the object."
Based on our senses, this matter seems like the world is real and genuine, but we only look at it from one point of view, and there is no way to look at the world as its true meaning is, except from the external dimension of our worldview. Experimental visualization gave.
But this is impossible, we can say that we are prisoners of our minds that are limited to only one point of view and look at the world from only one window.
But how do we know that the world we look at from this window is real?
What if what we see doesn't really exist and the view out the window is actually a view into our mind?
Imagine that there is nothing but the mind and its perception...
In such a case, the whole world cannot exist in the mind as it exists outside, and the world is a creation of the subject who understands it.
And this means that our experience of the outside world depends on our mental perception.
Comments
Post a Comment