Skip to main content

"Philosophy Of Egoism"

 Getting to know a point of view


"philosophy of egoism"


Our main problem with absolute and pure reality is that we do not have equal perception limits of the nature of things

In fact, the level of our understanding of anything is effective in the final perception of the nature of that thing, and this means that the world we understand may not be what it really is.

Since there is always relativity in our understanding of the nature of things, we can only learn from each of our choices what our senses selectively choose and what our mind creates from it in the bigger picture.

Kant discussed the reasonableness of our relationship between the entity (subject) and the intention (object) and said that everything that exists is an expression of the entity's understanding of it:

"Whatever we see are not what we see. Certainly, what the object is and can be will remain unknown to us and still separate from the extent of our senses.

We know nothing except the method by which we perceive the object."

Based on our senses, this matter seems like the world is real and genuine, but we only look at it from one point of view, and there is no way to look at the world as its true meaning is, except from the external dimension of our worldview. Experimental visualization gave.

But this is impossible, we can say that we are prisoners of our minds that are limited to only one point of view and look at the world from only one window.

But how do we know that the world we look at from this window is real?

What if what we see doesn't really exist and the view out the window is actually a view into our mind?

Imagine that there is nothing but the mind and its perception...

In such a case, the whole world cannot exist in the mind as it exists outside, and the world is a creation of the subject who understands it.

And this means that our experience of the outside world depends on our mental perception.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Soviet Union

 Thirty-two years ago, on days like these, the Soviet Union officially announced its collapse. The result of this collapse was the creation of fifteen independent countries. Political systems collapse in various ways. The way the Soviet Union collapsed was from within, although external factors had an indirect effect. I can list the reasons for the collapse: 1: Directing most of the country's budget and resources towards military productions and space programs and neglecting to provide the essential needs of the people such as food, housing, etc. 2: Spending huge budgets to continue the war in Afghanistan and maintaining military bases in satellite countries and economic grants to communist countries in Europe and other parts of the world, which in total led to severe economic weakness of the country and the growth of dissatisfaction among the people. 3: The overthrow of a corrupt class of politicians who did not think about anything else except maintaining their positions and excl...

WHAT IF..

  Imagine this. You're standing in the middle of a city square. The same one you walk through every morning, coffee in hand, headphones in, trying to ignore the world before your third caffeine hit. But today, it’s different. The air is dense. Your phone has no signal. Time doesn’t feel like it’s moving. And then like a switch flipped in the fabric of reality they begin to appear. All of them. Every human who has ever lived. From the earliest humans who once scraped tools from stone, to people who wore togas in Rome, to those who died in wars, plagues, revolutions everyone is here. And oddly, they’re all wearing the same uniform simple, clean, neutral clothing, a reset of identity and hierarchy. No designer brands. No medals. No blood. Just humans. Just us. Suddenly, the streets are full. No, overflowing. Billions. We had 8 billion alive yesterday. But the total number of humans who’ve ever lived? Estimates say around 117 billion. Now imagine 109 billion people added to Earth toda...

Media Belief and the quiet Engineering of Reality

 Dear Fox News, STOP USING MEK (NCRI) AS A SOURCE. First of all—can’t you hear them? The people are not calling for a cult, a faction, or recycled extremism. They are calling for the King 👑 Reza Pahlavi. Second—and this matters deeply— This article is written by the same person the New York Post recently promoted, and it relies on quotations from MEK. For clarification: MEK is not an opposition movement. It is the other side of the same coin as the Islamic Republic. They posture as anti-regime only because they seek power for themselves— with the same ideology, the same authoritarian instincts, and the same contempt for the Iranian people. Do not be fooled by cosmetic opposition. Do not launder extremism through Western media. And please—stop promoting MEK. Now, let’s talk about the real danger. Here’s the truth: Not missiles. Not borders. Media illiteracy. Media is not neutral. Words are not innocent. Sentence structure, tone, and framing decide how you feel before you even reali...