Skip to main content

L.A

 Hi, I'm heartbroken for the people whose houses burned down.

The house is sacred and I do not accept people who never find the most important trait that distinguishes us from other beings on this planet, that is, being human, and because I am so weak and cowardly that I cannot answer them, I have to give my answer here. and I hope that you guys can forgive me.

The killer of the CEO of the medical insurance company, who became a hero to some, had not yet become accustomed to the atmosphere of prison when the fire in Los Angeles made it clear that insurance companies did not cover many of the multi-million dollar homes that were burned to the ground (much to the dismay of those who could). They don't have the money to buy those houses and they used tax evasion as an excuse to say that they are right !

Isn't it better for the common people to conclude that the insurance company is turning its back on the rich, that it is not about sucking the blood of the poor?

Insurance is not to turn the world into a paradise, but it is a tool and in order for this tool to work, it needs predictable situations so that it can model based on them and adjust its accounting and financial books according to that model.

It cannot be modeled that the earth will suffer from a drought and then the high-speed winds will spread the fire and several areas will be razed to the ground. No human being can design and run a business based on such a situation.

Isn't it better for the common people to understand that medical insurances have no problem with paying the costs, but whether the patients are rich or poor, they need to know what's going on and why there are so many requests for MRI? Shouldn't it be better for the people to understand that insurance companies have no problem with paying for the damage that happens to people's homes?

But not the events that are happening to the planet, and there is no difference between the rich and the poor? Can't the people who manage the insurances be scumbags? Of course they can. The same CEO who knew about the presence of carcinogenic substances in his product and told his employees to keep quiet about it can become the chairman of the board of directors of an insurance company tomorrow.

But shouldn't the common people understand that regardless of whether they are patriots or not, the business will perish if it does not follow commercial logic? Isn't it better for the common people to understand the things that should have been done at the governance level so that many expenses are not created or reduced, and they were not done.

Because they themselves did not vote in such a way that the central government and local government would prioritized them, it cannot be blamed on the insurance and it is not like we pay a monthly insurance premium so that a company comes to solve the social political duties that we had and did not fulfill them later?

Do the people want to think at all? Or do they just want to be angry and remain in a back and forth cycle of "We didn't deserve this" and "you deserve it" ?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Soviet Union

 Thirty-two years ago, on days like these, the Soviet Union officially announced its collapse. The result of this collapse was the creation of fifteen independent countries. Political systems collapse in various ways. The way the Soviet Union collapsed was from within, although external factors had an indirect effect. I can list the reasons for the collapse: 1: Directing most of the country's budget and resources towards military productions and space programs and neglecting to provide the essential needs of the people such as food, housing, etc. 2: Spending huge budgets to continue the war in Afghanistan and maintaining military bases in satellite countries and economic grants to communist countries in Europe and other parts of the world, which in total led to severe economic weakness of the country and the growth of dissatisfaction among the people. 3: The overthrow of a corrupt class of politicians who did not think about anything else except maintaining their positions and excl...
Post a Comment
Read more

WHAT IF..

  Imagine this. You're standing in the middle of a city square. The same one you walk through every morning, coffee in hand, headphones in, trying to ignore the world before your third caffeine hit. But today, it’s different. The air is dense. Your phone has no signal. Time doesn’t feel like it’s moving. And then like a switch flipped in the fabric of reality they begin to appear. All of them. Every human who has ever lived. From the earliest humans who once scraped tools from stone, to people who wore togas in Rome, to those who died in wars, plagues, revolutions everyone is here. And oddly, they’re all wearing the same uniform simple, clean, neutral clothing, a reset of identity and hierarchy. No designer brands. No medals. No blood. Just humans. Just us. Suddenly, the streets are full. No, overflowing. Billions. We had 8 billion alive yesterday. But the total number of humans who’ve ever lived? Estimates say around 117 billion. Now imagine 109 billion people added to Earth toda...
Post a Comment
Read more

Media Belief and the quiet Engineering of Reality

 Dear Fox News, STOP USING MEK (NCRI) AS A SOURCE. First of all—can’t you hear them? The people are not calling for a cult, a faction, or recycled extremism. They are calling for the King 👑 Reza Pahlavi. Second—and this matters deeply— This article is written by the same person the New York Post recently promoted, and it relies on quotations from MEK. For clarification: MEK is not an opposition movement. It is the other side of the same coin as the Islamic Republic. They posture as anti-regime only because they seek power for themselves— with the same ideology, the same authoritarian instincts, and the same contempt for the Iranian people. Do not be fooled by cosmetic opposition. Do not launder extremism through Western media. And please—stop promoting MEK. Now, let’s talk about the real danger. Here’s the truth: Not missiles. Not borders. Media illiteracy. Media is not neutral. Words are not innocent. Sentence structure, tone, and framing decide how you feel before you even reali...
Post a Comment
Read more