Skip to main content

Questions

 A few years ago, many of the questions that were asked were about "What podcast do you listen to?", "Can you recommend a book please?", "Where is your source of study?", "Who do you think says the right thing?".

But now the questions have changed significantly. Now it's about "Why did this blogger turned crazy all of the sudden?", "Do you also think that, that person's podcast is no longer attractive?", "Why did I think this writer was different from the others?".

This perceptible shift has two causes, one of which is related to you, and the other is related to those whose contents you saw, heard and read.

After enjoying someone's monologues and dialogues for a while, you come to the conclusion that he's turned delusional, or was from the beginning, which is good news, because it is a sign that you are growing up. And when a person grows older, his expectations also increase. After adolescence, the stabilization of body growth leads to the mistake that one's mind has reached a relative stability. But it is not so.

Body's changes, even if closely monitored by the bathroom mirror, are much more limited than brain maneuvers. Although your body looks mature, mentally you are a child who is growing very fast. Of course, psychologically, you don't like it to be true. Because an adult person, due to his social and family responsibilities, it is beneficial to pretend that he has reached intellectual sufficiency and stands on top of the hill and looks at the world!

This is the part that concerns you. There is another part that is related to those you are following.

Just Once, evaluate your distance with the person you are following. You, as a random person, from thousands of kilometers away, have become the audience of someone who under normal circumstances would never have been willing to sit down with and have a cup of coffee with.

This shows how wide the scope of the other party's audience is, which includes you, and how easy it is for any person to enter the circle of these audiences. Therefore, it is quite natural that he will be followed by other people who are very different from you, and even culturally and educationally, they will be the opposite of you.

Now, if the group of his audience, who are exactly the opposite of you, constitute the majority of his audience, that person will be drawn to them, not to you. Because it is very, very, very rare that someone who has the ability to attract an audience, and then not pay attention to the opinion and support of those who are in the majority!

In most cases, a person who is influencing a large number of people is himself being influenced by those people who are under his influence. So, if it seems that the person you were following has been talking nonsense lately, it could be because he has become the same type as his audiences that likes that kind of nonsense.

Because psychologically we need to rely on them. Even in extreme situations, such as the group of flat earth believers, we see people who are logical people by default, but being a member of a denying group has brought them a good feeling that they don't want to loose.

You can imagine how this mechanism can work in more ambiguous and complex and subtle issues, such as "is the government bad or good?".

The search for the righteous words never has an end point. But you can't be forever a follower of someone, cause you might end up completely disagreeing with them. The disagreement could be either because they are telling nonsense or they are telling harsh truths but you don't want to wake up to reality!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Soviet Union

 Thirty-two years ago, on days like these, the Soviet Union officially announced its collapse. The result of this collapse was the creation of fifteen independent countries. Political systems collapse in various ways. The way the Soviet Union collapsed was from within, although external factors had an indirect effect. I can list the reasons for the collapse: 1: Directing most of the country's budget and resources towards military productions and space programs and neglecting to provide the essential needs of the people such as food, housing, etc. 2: Spending huge budgets to continue the war in Afghanistan and maintaining military bases in satellite countries and economic grants to communist countries in Europe and other parts of the world, which in total led to severe economic weakness of the country and the growth of dissatisfaction among the people. 3: The overthrow of a corrupt class of politicians who did not think about anything else except maintaining their positions and excl...

WHAT IF..

  Imagine this. You're standing in the middle of a city square. The same one you walk through every morning, coffee in hand, headphones in, trying to ignore the world before your third caffeine hit. But today, it’s different. The air is dense. Your phone has no signal. Time doesn’t feel like it’s moving. And then like a switch flipped in the fabric of reality they begin to appear. All of them. Every human who has ever lived. From the earliest humans who once scraped tools from stone, to people who wore togas in Rome, to those who died in wars, plagues, revolutions everyone is here. And oddly, they’re all wearing the same uniform simple, clean, neutral clothing, a reset of identity and hierarchy. No designer brands. No medals. No blood. Just humans. Just us. Suddenly, the streets are full. No, overflowing. Billions. We had 8 billion alive yesterday. But the total number of humans who’ve ever lived? Estimates say around 117 billion. Now imagine 109 billion people added to Earth toda...

Media Belief and the quiet Engineering of Reality

 Dear Fox News, STOP USING MEK (NCRI) AS A SOURCE. First of all—can’t you hear them? The people are not calling for a cult, a faction, or recycled extremism. They are calling for the King 👑 Reza Pahlavi. Second—and this matters deeply— This article is written by the same person the New York Post recently promoted, and it relies on quotations from MEK. For clarification: MEK is not an opposition movement. It is the other side of the same coin as the Islamic Republic. They posture as anti-regime only because they seek power for themselves— with the same ideology, the same authoritarian instincts, and the same contempt for the Iranian people. Do not be fooled by cosmetic opposition. Do not launder extremism through Western media. And please—stop promoting MEK. Now, let’s talk about the real danger. Here’s the truth: Not missiles. Not borders. Media illiteracy. Media is not neutral. Words are not innocent. Sentence structure, tone, and framing decide how you feel before you even reali...