Skip to main content

KEEPERS OF MEMORY

 Have you ever thought about people's past?

For example, I really wanted to know how my great-great-grandfather lived.

How did he spend his days, what adventures did he have in his life, and did he tell anyone about it?


I think everything was normal back then, and if it wasn't normal, it was accepted as part of reality and easier to digest. While fleeing, they might have crossed a river and his mother would have been swept away, his wife would have been kidnapped by attackers, and his child would have died of illness. He didn't say to himself, "No one should hear my story!"


For thousands of years, human affairs were divided into two categories: powerful people and powerless people.

The one who lacked power accepted that his story would not be heard. It was the powerful person for whom a chamber was built for his grave and on whose wall an inscription was written that he was a very good person and that they praised him. Because having a story required power and was a kind of gift.


A person who had no power had no story. Even when the powerless tried to pass on a story orally, it was about powerful people, not about their own lives. Their stories were about monsters, witches, healing, kings, and demons. From a certain point on, powerless people decided to write not stories, but their own thoughts. The framework was still the same — "the powerful person," or "another beyond me." But it was philosophy and logic, and the central voice was: "I suffered. From nature, from my body, from rulers, etc. And it's important for me to express this because I suffered."


This is a modern phenomenon. Because in the modern world everyone deserves to survive, and therefore everyone has their own story. Something we see on social media.


Even now, even if you go to the middle of the desert, you have an antenna, and human capabilities are moving towards evolution — but nature remains unchanged. It has not modified itself for the health of our bodies since thousands of years ago. It does not owe us anything; we owe it to nature.


In such a world, everyone is a nobleman, and everyone's grave has a chamber, and the walls are covered with moving pictures with sound. Some may grumble that there is no longer just one king in each region, as in the past, and that they see millions of kings around them. But that does not change the fact that human perception of life is shifting.


The foundation of people's culture, philosophy, and religion has always been related to what their perception of their own lives was. And now that perception has completely changed. No one is willing to be only a man of truth, or a man of nature, or a man of the times. Now everyone is going to be a prophet, and everyone is receiving revelation, and everyone is at the top of power.


But here lies the paradox of our age: when everyone is a prophet, who listens? When every story is carved into digital stone, do we risk forgetting how to truly remember? For centuries, memory was fragile — dependent on human breath, on firelight gatherings, on fragile papyrus and ink. Its fragility made it precious. Today, memory seems immortal, endlessly archived in servers and clouds, yet perhaps more vulnerable than ever. A power outage, a corrupted file, a forgotten password — and the prophet’s revelation is gone, as if it never existed.


Maybe the question is not whether everyone has a story, but whether anyone knows how to keep it alive. Because stories are not only about survival; they are about connection. My great-great-grandfather’s voice may be lost to me, but the search for it keeps me human. And maybe that is the truest form of power we have today: not to be kings, not to be prophets, but to be keepers of memory.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Soviet Union

 Thirty-two years ago, on days like these, the Soviet Union officially announced its collapse. The result of this collapse was the creation of fifteen independent countries. Political systems collapse in various ways. The way the Soviet Union collapsed was from within, although external factors had an indirect effect. I can list the reasons for the collapse: 1: Directing most of the country's budget and resources towards military productions and space programs and neglecting to provide the essential needs of the people such as food, housing, etc. 2: Spending huge budgets to continue the war in Afghanistan and maintaining military bases in satellite countries and economic grants to communist countries in Europe and other parts of the world, which in total led to severe economic weakness of the country and the growth of dissatisfaction among the people. 3: The overthrow of a corrupt class of politicians who did not think about anything else except maintaining their positions and excl...

WHAT IF..

  Imagine this. You're standing in the middle of a city square. The same one you walk through every morning, coffee in hand, headphones in, trying to ignore the world before your third caffeine hit. But today, it’s different. The air is dense. Your phone has no signal. Time doesn’t feel like it’s moving. And then like a switch flipped in the fabric of reality they begin to appear. All of them. Every human who has ever lived. From the earliest humans who once scraped tools from stone, to people who wore togas in Rome, to those who died in wars, plagues, revolutions everyone is here. And oddly, they’re all wearing the same uniform simple, clean, neutral clothing, a reset of identity and hierarchy. No designer brands. No medals. No blood. Just humans. Just us. Suddenly, the streets are full. No, overflowing. Billions. We had 8 billion alive yesterday. But the total number of humans who’ve ever lived? Estimates say around 117 billion. Now imagine 109 billion people added to Earth toda...

Media Belief and the quiet Engineering of Reality

 Dear Fox News, STOP USING MEK (NCRI) AS A SOURCE. First of all—can’t you hear them? The people are not calling for a cult, a faction, or recycled extremism. They are calling for the King 👑 Reza Pahlavi. Second—and this matters deeply— This article is written by the same person the New York Post recently promoted, and it relies on quotations from MEK. For clarification: MEK is not an opposition movement. It is the other side of the same coin as the Islamic Republic. They posture as anti-regime only because they seek power for themselves— with the same ideology, the same authoritarian instincts, and the same contempt for the Iranian people. Do not be fooled by cosmetic opposition. Do not launder extremism through Western media. And please—stop promoting MEK. Now, let’s talk about the real danger. Here’s the truth: Not missiles. Not borders. Media illiteracy. Media is not neutral. Words are not innocent. Sentence structure, tone, and framing decide how you feel before you even reali...